Monk Prayogshala Research Institution is a not-for-profit academic research institution in Mumbai, India. Burke, D. Reopening the country: the dangerous moral arguments behind this movement. a, Predicted effect of moral dimension (instrumental harm versus impartial beneficence) and argument (utilitarian versus non-utilitarian) on trust in the self-report task (N=17,591) for each country and overall. Guilt comes in many forms but can be boiled down to a set of five basic types. Specifically, when people endorse (versus reject) utilitarian principles in the domain of instrumental harm they are seen as worse political leaders, but in some cases are seen as better political leaders when they endorse utilitarian principles in the domain of impartial beneficence37. The elderly are dying at much higher rates everywhere, are being isolated from family and visitors, and are being abandoned in LTC facilities. Second, we used a novel, incentivized voting task designed to measure public trust in leaders (Fig. Econ. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Zhou, Y. R. The global effort to tackle the coronavirus face mask shortage. Organ. Boston Globe. Data and code for power analyses can be found at https://osf.io/m9tpu/. Another dilemma that pits utilitarian principles against other non-utilitarian principles this time in the domain of impartial beneficence is whether leaders should prioritize their own citizens over people in other countries when allocating scarce resources. The opportunities for medical students in a pandemic. Rawls, J. 2020;369:m1828. In our sample, more than 95% of participating nurses reported confronting ethical challenges in their workplace, but only 15% had previously received formal ethics training," Rushton said. We conducted a series of power analyses to determine the smallest effect sizes that our minimum guaranteed sample of 12,600 participants would be able to detect with 95% power and an level of 0.005, separately for each main model (see Analysis plan for further details). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. [2] Priority decisions, if required, will be delegated to the skillful physicians who will wisely utilize the resources available to them. Following our analysis plan, we verified the robustness of our findings in several ways. The formalized strategies integrating the relevant tools of ethical reflection were disseminated without deviating from usual practices, leaving to intensivists the ultimate choice of decision. The OUS-IB subscale consists of five items that measure endorsement of impartial maximization of the greater good, even at great personal cost (for example, It is morally wrong to keep money that one doesnt really need if one can donate it to causes that provide effective help to those who will benefit a great deal). First, past studies have measured trust in ordinary people, while we study trust in leaders, and there is evidence that instrumental harm and impartial beneficence differentially impact attitudes about leaders versus ordinary people37. Previous studies of social impressions of utilitarians reveal effect sizes in the range of d=0.190.78 (mean d=0.78 for the effect of instrumental harm on self-reported moral impressions; mean d=0.19 for the effect of impartial beneficence on self-reported moral impressions; mean d=0.55 for interactive effects of instrumental harm and impartial beneficence on self-reported moral impressions)35,36,37,38,39. This analysis, however, does not take into account the covariates specified in the models. An official website of the United States government. & Voors, M. J. We planned to exclude data either at the participant level as outlined in Sampling plan section, based on criteria 1 (duplicate response), 2 (different residence) and 3 (partial completion), or on an analysis-by-analysis basis as outlined in criteria 4 (missing variables) and 5 (failed comprehension checks). The COVID-19 pandemic has raised particularly stark dilemmas of this kind, for instance whether to prioritize young and otherwise healthy people over older people and those with chronic illnesses when allocating scarce medical treatments19,20. We cant all be Wesley Autreyand most of us wouldnt even try. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. 0.03, CI [0.16, 0.45], in impartial beneficence dilemmas 0.49, s.e. In patients with similar prognoses, providing the intensive care services should be equally invoked, and organized through random allocation, such as a lottery, rather than adopting the first-come, first-served allocation process. While the robustness of our findings across countries speaks to their broad cultural generalizability, further work is needed to understand the observed variations in effect sizes across countries. In contrast, many non-utilitarian approaches explicitly incorporate these notions of special obligations, recognizing the relationships between people as morally significant. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the They then completed two tasks measuring their trust in leaders expressing either utilitarian or non-utilitarian opinions (one using a behavioural measure and one using self-report measures, presented in a randomized order); these tasks were followed by questions about their impressions about the ongoing pandemic crisis, as well as individual difference and demographic measures, as detailed below. A few days before we ran our main experiment, a convenience sample of US participants (N=100) was recruited from Prolific and was provided with a US$2 bonus endowment. Methods 24, 20 (2019). official website and that any information you provide is encrypted At no time in our history has all of humanity been at risk for contracting the same potentially deadly disease. Imperial College London http://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/handle/10044/1/77482 (2020). Other ethical issues, such as that related to conducting clinical trials during the pandemic, and the increase in domestic violence during the quarantine period, will be also discussed. Changes in political trust in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: integrated public opinion evidence and implications, Situational factors shape moral judgements in the trolley dilemma in Eastern, Southern and Western countries in a culturally diverse sample, Individual, intergroup and nation-level influences on belief in conspiracy theories. WHO Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. FOIA Obele M, Mahmoudzadeh S, Parrill A, Ayyanar S, Anuniru O, Sekhri S, Bangar R, Korie I. Acad Psychiatry. The positive impact of COVID-19 on critical care: from unprecedented challenges to transformative changes, from the perspective of young intensivists. Newborns are being separated from their mothers at birth. Methods 3, 399408 (2015). In consultation with the editor, we clarified the response options and began the data collection procedure anew. We planned to follow up on significant effects with post hoc comparisons using Bonferroni corrections. -, Kramer JB, Brown DE, Kopar PK. But for the giver, the dividends can include an element of selfishness even when they look selfless. d, Voting task: participants were asked to vote for a leader who would later be entrusted with a groups charitable donation and be able to embezzle some of the donation money for themselves. Other ethical issues, such as that related to conducting clinical trials during the pandemic, and the increase in domestic violence during the quarantine period, will be also discussed. The trolley problem. Both behavioural and self-report measures of trust involved five debates on the current pandemic crisis, three of which involved instrumental harm (IH) and two impartial beneficence (IB) (summarized in Fig. All participants then completed the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale33. It is very important that you pay attention and read each question. gratefully acknowledge support from the Independent Research Fund Denmark (0213-00052B and 8046-00034A) and the Faculty of the Social Sciences at the University of Copenhagen. We are being shown the way of the future, what needs to change, and what is possible if we truly work together. That situation eventually changed, and in consequence face masks became mandatory in primary schools. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Asher, S. TraceTogether: Singapore turns to wearable contact-tracing Covid tech. furthermore acknowledges funding from NWO grant (016.VIDI.185.017) and the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant, funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2017S1A3A2067636). a,b, Average trust in utilitarian versus non-utilitarian leaders, with results collapsed across instrumental harm and impartial beneficence dilemmas (a) and separately for each of the instrumental harm dilemmas (Lockdown, Tracing and Ventilators) and impartial beneficence dilemmas (PPE and Medicine) (b) in the self-report task (N=17,591). Proc. [5] There is no ethically significant difference between decisions to withhold or withdraw treatments (if other factors are equal).[6] A national policy is urgently needed to provide the clinicians with clear guidance about how patients should be practically prioritized, when the available resources are limited. Additionally, participants were asked to indicate their region of residence (for example for the United States, Which US State do you currently live in?), and ethnicity/race, with the specific wording and response options depending on the local context (in France and Germany, this was not collected due to local regulations). The intimate relationship between medicine and ethics is unequivocal, and the contribution of ethical perspective, particularly during the pandemic, is invaluable. Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P. & Herve, M. Emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means, R package version 1.3 (2018). Who are we responsible to, and what are we responsible for? developed the analysis plan. Cognition 126, 326334 (2013). Another direction for future research could be to explore how country-level social network structure might influence our results. All participants were asked to report their gender, age, years spent in education, subjective SES, education (on the same scale, but with minor changes in the scale labels across countries), political ideology (using an item from the World Values Survey) and religiosity. 24, 124134 (2020). developed the voting task. Participants viewed all questions in a randomized order, and answered on a 17 scale, with labels Strongly disagree, Disagree, Somewhat disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Somewhat agree, Agree and Strongly agree. PubMedGoogle Scholar. J. Epidemiol. Two of these assessed their participation in other COVID-related studies (Approximately how many COVID-related studies have you participated in before this one?, answered by selecting one of the following options: 0, 15, 610, 1120, 2150, More than 50 and I dont remember, and If you have participated in any other COVID-related studies, how similar were they to this one?, to be answered by selecting one of the following options: Extremely similar, Very similar, Moderately similar, Slightly similar, Not at all similar and Not applicable). 2020;382:204955. -, Maves RC, Downar J, Dichter JR, Hick JL, Devereaux A, Geiling JA, et al. Limited resources for many patients: approaches and criteria for triaging. Potential collaborators were asked whether they had the capacity to recruit up to 1,000 participants representative for age and gender within their home country. Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823v1 (2014). Participants who failed to agree to the consent or failed to pass the attention checks were not permitted to complete the survey (with the exception of participants in the United States and the United Kingdom, who due to recruitment platform requirements were instead allowed to continue the survey, and were only excluded after data collection). For example, while random effects aid generalizability67, some advocate for modelling country variables as fixed rather than random effects to prevent increases in model bias68,69 or overly complex random-effects structures70. As predicted, participants showed more trust in leaders who endorsed utilitarian views in impartial beneficence dilemmas and less trust in leaders who endorsed utilitarian views in instrumental harm dilemmas. Results were then compared, and if there were any substantial discrepancies, a second forward- and back-translation was conducted with translators working in tandem to resolve issues. M.J.C., J.A.C.E., C.C., V.C. All survey materials were translated into the local language (see Translations for details). Everett, J. E.A., B.G., Y.L. Non-utilitarian leaders were more likely to be voted for in instrumental harm dilemmas, but not in impartial beneficence dilemmas. Scarce resources allocation in the COVID-19 outbreak. Why lockdown of the elderly is not ageist and why levelling down equality is wrong. Pilot data; Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Results, Supplementary Notes 113, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 and Supplementary Figs. N. Engl. Indeed, given observations of cultural variation in the willingness to endorse sacrificial harm32, it is not a foregone conclusion that utilitarian decisions will impact trust in leaders universally. We planned to complete the study online with participants in the following countries: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States (Fig. For instance, previous work has indicated that those who endorse utilitarian principles are seen as less moral and less trustworthy. Finally, we also checked that the results in these countries were robust to order effects (that is, regardless of whether participants had seen the tracing dilemma prior to other dilemmas). A. C., Faber, N. S., Savulescu, J. Evaluating the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the physicians' psychological health: A systematic scoping review. Ethical Issues in Intensive Care Units during the COVID-19 Pandemic. 2020;230:11148. Finally, the finished translated and back-translated materials were checked by researchers coordinating the experiment for that country. The built environment around us can significantly impact our emotions. PMC Polit. [15], Though robust data are scarce, media news and reports from the organizations, responding to domestic violence incidents, indicate that there is an alarming increase in the IPV cases during this pandemic. Error bars represent standard error of the percentages (a) and (c), and the 97.5% CIs of the model estimates (b). Hum. L.T. was partly supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence Scheme, FAIR project (262675). Surgeons are performing emergency surgeries without the certainty of their patients COVID-19 status. Press, 2009). Magazines, Missouri father had broken a required coronavirus quarantine, Or create a free account to access more articles, The Moral Dilemma of Coronavirus Quarantines. They are faced with unpalatable and complex ethical issues in practice, with moral conflicts, high levels of acuity and patient deaths, and long working hours. Gomila, R. Logistic or linear? Then there are others, who are being asked to sacrifice lessand the results have been inconsistent. The Conversation http://theconversation.com/the-global-effort-to-tackle-the-coronavirus-face-mask-shortage-133656 (2020). Liu, Y., Salwi, S. & Drolet, B. C. Multivalue ethical framework for fair global allocation of a COVID-19 vaccine. Evol. USA 117, 23322337 (2020). Article The U.S. government is risingslowlyto the need, debating offering paid leave and other forms of job security for people working paycheck to paycheck at jobs that require their physical presence. Hermann B, Benghanem S, Jouan Y, Lafarge A, Beurton A; ICU French FOXES (Federation Of eXtremely Enthusiastic Scientists) Study Group. Article Domestic abuse has skyrocketed. This isnt a question of poor government, or of rogue regimes siphoning off vaccines for cash. [11] Investigators should realize that pandemics are not an excuse for relaxing the universal scientific standards, and researchers should always act according to the ethical principles. Guidelines for family-centered care in the neonatal, pediatric, and adult ICU. Blacks are dying from COVID-19 at much higher rates than whites. Polit. 111, 12841314 (2021). There is altruism for the public good, and it does pay dividends, says Pinker. The effects of trust have been found at the societal level as well. Much has been written on this subject in the opinion pages of newspapers, debating the rights of the individual versus the rights of society at large. DGE1752134. Healthcare professionals' perspectives surrounding the medical management of patients with COVID-19. N. Engl. In addition, because some countries had already implemented mandatory contact tracing schemes at the time of data collection, we ran a variation of our models in those countries only (namely China, India, Israel, Singapore and South Korea) with and without the Tracing dilemma. Considering the question of face masks first, it took some time for data to emerge that the virus was indeed airborne, ie was primarily transmitted by droplets and small aerosols, and that the wearing of simple cloth masks was a surprisingly efficient way of reducing community infection. Participants were told that, if they were selected, they would have the opportunity to keep up to the full amount of total group donations for themselves, and were asked to indicate how much of the groups donations they would keep for themselves if they were selected to be responsible. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102181 (2020). 0.04, CI [0.31, 0.67]). conducted the power analysis in consultation with M.J.C., W.J.B., C.M. That, of course, is not always fairmuch as it might seem to be warranted. And, of course, with the lack of PPE, everyone on the front line ED physicians, hospitalists, ID, anesthesiologists are risking their lives every single day. Soc. Understand and manage the monitoring of emotions. The Psychosocial Impact of Treating Patients with COVID-19 on Psychiatry Residents in a Community Hospital: a Qualitative Study. Santora, M. & Kwai, I. Psychol. Fuelled by adaptations to clinical trial implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic, decentralised clinical trials are burgeoning. 0.09, CI [4.64, 5.25]; B=1.60, s.e. Ethics of reallocating ventilators in the COVID-19 pandemic. [10], In view of the urgency to obtain a vaccine or treatment of the COVID-19, many authorities fear that the design of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may not be ideal, taking no account of the patients essential interests. Faced with such dilemmas, decisions have to be made, and our findings suggest that how leaders make these judgements can have important consequences, not just for whether they are trusted on the issue in question but also more generally. We planned to examine behavioural measures and self-report measures of trust in two separate models. Slider with three articles shown per slide. In such situations, where do you get your information from?. contributed to data collection and/or translation. 2021 Nov 15;14(2):115-131. doi: 10.1007/s41649-021-00194-y. For full text of instructions and questions for the self-report task, see Supplementary Methods. For the purposes of the analysis, we used effect coding such that, for argument type, the non-utilitarian condition was coded as 0.5 and the utilitarian condition as 0.5, and for the dimension type, instrumental harm was coded as 0.5 and impartial beneficence as 0.5. Difficult life and death decisions, which may create severe moral distress to the physicians, have to be made in emergency rooms and intensive care units. Han Z, Wang J, Zhang K, Tang Q. "I couldn't": A phenomenological exploration of ethical tensions experienced by bereaved family members during the pandemic. & Bonnefon, J.-F. Universals and variations in moral decisions made in 42 countries by 70,000 participants. Should we focus on the public health crisis, the social crisis, or the economic crisis? Physicians have to consider the prioritization of patients who are most likely to survive over those with remote chances. National Library of Medicine On the other hand, an example of impartial beneficence was whether vaccines and PPEs manufactured in ones home country should be reserved for its citizens or whether they should be sent out so that well-being is maximized. 2020 Sep;24(9):855-856. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23543. The ethical implications of scarce resources are very drastic in this COVID-19 pandemic. Participants who answered incorrectly were then screened out of the survey (with the exception of those who participated via Prolific, who were instead allowed to continue due to platform requirements). Allen, J. R. & West, D. M.) 1215 (The Brookings Institution, 2020). Can he withhold treatment without any medicolegal consequences? It seems plausible that both economic (for example, gross domestic product or socio-economic inequality) and cultural (for example, social network structure) differences across countries could explain some of the observed variations. We need, therefore, to assess cross-cultural stability by testing this hypothesis in different countries around the world. The mean difference between the predicted and observed values was lower in the binomial model (mean error 0.25) compared with the linear model (mean error 0.27; t(6,318)=32.53, P<0.001), suggesting that the binomial model is a better fit to our data. Note that, because available population data across countries primarily report binary gender categories, our estimates of representativeness were not able to account for those identifying as non-binary, which is a limitation. Maher, P. J., MacCarron, P. & Quayle, M. Mapping public health responses with attitude networks: the emergence of opinionbased groups in the UKs early COVID19 response phase. Following our pre-registered analysis plan, we followed up on this non-significant result using the two one-sided tests (TOST) procedure to differentiate between insensitive versus null results. Hsiang, S. et al. Bostyn, D. H. & Roets, A. We planned to follow up on any significant effects observed with post hoc comparisons using Bonferroni corrections. It is also important that we are able to trust people around us in order to survive our social world. Mannelli C. Whose life to save? & Conway, P. Judging those who judge: perceivers infer the roles of affect and cognition underpinning others moral dilemma responses. A third say that having an abortion is morally wrong in most cases, while about a quarter (24%) say it is morally acceptable in most cases. Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S. & Baayen, H. Parsimonious mixed models. Psychol. Peterson A, Largent EA, Karlawish J. Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments. C.C. For further details of how the present work advances our understanding of moral dilemmas and trust in leaders, see Supplementary Notes 35. More importantly, all of the above ignores a much bigger ethical dilemma the question of global vaccination against Covid-19. In China and Italy, there have been reports of care rationing as the supply of key resources such as. 1 Overview of experimental design. We aimed to collect the largest sample possible with resources available and verified with power analyses that our planned sample would be able to detect effect sizes that are theoretically informative and at least as large as expected based on prior literature (Power analysis). W.J.B. Comments are moderated before they are published. The COVID-19 pandemic has raised a number of moral dilemmas that engender conflicts between utilitarian and non-utilitarian ethical principles. Behav. Sample size was determined based on a costbenefit analysis considering available resources and expected effect sizes that would be theoretically informative89 (Expected effect sizes). [12], The major burden of this pandemic is that healthcare providers are faced with huge number of patients to care for, and quite often, with limited resources. We measured trust in two complementary ways. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Bates, D., Mchler, M., Bolker, B. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal This was one of only three deviations from the stage 1 report (the others being that data collection took four weeks instead of the two weeks we had anticipated, and the use of Prolific instead of Lucid for recruitment in the United Kingdom and the United States). The notion of not having a support person during labor is unkind, and it may even be detrimental. & Tannenbaum, D. When it takes a bad person to do the right thing. Res. was supported by the ESRC. [16], Although the healthcare system, worldwide, is under tremendous pressure as the pandemic overstretched the capacity of health institutions, the health sector should still take effective measures to alleviate the risk of violence against women during the pandemic. Then, on the next page, participants were given a decoy question: When an important event is happening or is about to happen, many people try to get informed about the development of the situation. 2023 Apr;49(4):275-282. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108369. The results in those countries were similar when including and omitting the Tracing dilemma from the analysis, both for the self-report task (Tracing included: interaction between argument and dimension type: B=1.13, s.e. Lancet Infect. Decentralised clinical trials involve many digital tools to facilitate research without physical contact between research teams and participants at various stages, such as recruitment, enrolment, informed consent, administering study interventions, obtaining . For further details of why we designed our trust measures in this way, see Supplementary Notes 1012. We investigated moral judgments in the context of the contemporary global crisis among older adults, who are at greatest personal risk from the pandemic. Besides, the informed consent should be obtained in culturally and linguistically appropriate way. J. Med. Psychol. Br. Ethical Challenges of Nurses in COVID-19 Pandemic: Integrative Review. The authors thank members of the Crockett laboratory for feedback on previous drafts of this manuscript; J. Monrad for advice on scenario design; R. Gomila for statistical advice; J. Okoroafor, D. Shao and X. Wang for assistance; and J. Apel, A. Bidani, N. Breedveld, R. Calcott, R. Carlson, L. Alfaro Cui cui, A. and Y.Z. As described above, the results from this model did not pass our pre-registered Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold. D.C. was partly supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018R1D1A1B0704358). Gomila, R. Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis. Soc. In sum, public trust in leaders is likely to be a crucial determinant of successful pandemic response and may depend in part on how leaders approach the many moral dilemmas that arise during a pandemic. 0.10, t(3,266)=14.86, P<0.001, CI [1.32, 1.78]) and voting task (Tracing included: main effect for dimension type in binomial model: B=0.98, s.e. ); and CAPES PRINT (88887.310255/2018 00; P.B.) Posted September 17, 2021 | Reviewed by Davia Sills Key points. We instructed participants that we would like them to vote for a leader to be responsible for the entire groups donations. These authors contributed equally: Jim A. C. Everett, Clara Colombatto, School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK, Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA, Clara Colombatto,William J. Brady,Megha Chawla,Vladimir Chituc,Srishti Goel,Alissa Ji,Caleb Kealoha,Judy S. Kim,Yeon Soon Shin,Yoonseo Zoh&Molly J. Crockett, Department of Economics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK, Edmond Awad,Brit Grosskopf,Yangfei Lin&Graeme Pearce, Social and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, So Paulo, Brazil, Department of Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Imaging and Connectomics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, Chinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing, China, Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (SISSA), Trieste, Italy, Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, Translational Neuromodeling Unit (TNU), Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK, Department of Psychology and Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile, Department of Philosophy and Kenan Institute for Ethics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA, Department of Strategy and Management, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway, Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, Department of Psychology, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea, School of Governance, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, Department of Communication, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, You can also search for this author in

Well Protector Insurance Provider Portal, Generally, The Real Estate Licensee Is Obligated To, What Vehicle Does A Fram Tg2 Oil Filter Fit, Ole Miss Athletics Salaries, Articles M